Search for: "Michael Amaral"
Results 1 - 20
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2024, 9:01 pm
” To the same effect was language from a plurality opinion authored by Justice Antonin Scalia a decade earlier in 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 4:25 am
John Hudson and Michael Birnbaum report for the Washington Post. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, May 17, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 10-16, 2024 Fee Variation in Private Equity Posted by Juliane Begenau (Stanford University), and Emil Siriwardane (Harvard Business School), on Friday, May 10, 2024 Tags: Fee Variation, GPs, LPAs, Private equity, SEC Investment Advisers and Sponsors Compliance Policies: Hot Topics Posted by… [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:30 am
Posted by the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, on Friday, May 17, 2024 Editor's Note: This roundup contains a collection of the posts published on the Forum during the week of May 10-16, 2024 Fee Variation in Private Equity Posted by Juliane Begenau (Stanford University), and Emil Siriwardane (Harvard Business School), on Friday, May 10, 2024 Tags: Fee Variation, GPs, LPAs, Private equity, SEC Investment Advisers and Sponsors Compliance Policies: Hot Topics Posted by… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 7:40 pm
“In this new podcast, Professor Amar offers weekly in-depth discussions on the most urgent and fascinating constitutional issues of our day. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
Professor Will Baude and Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen, to their credit, made a point along the same lines. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
Indeed, to call it a “too clever by half … cabalistic overreading” (see Michael Dorf, quoting Akhil Amar) might, if anything, give it too much credit. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:38 am
“Trump Lawyer Reads the Constitution Like a Secret Code Requiring Decryption”: Law professor Michael C. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The value of Professor Amar’s article was to show how landmark cases built on the principle and how it could generate further insights.Yet Professor Amar recognized that one can take intratextualism too far. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Akhil Amar & Vikram Amar.] [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
A Reply to Peter Keisler and Richard Bernstein, and Michael Luttig, on Section 3 (2/7/24). [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:54 am
[Note: This is the fifth in a series of essays responding to objections that have been made to enforcing Section Three of the Constitution. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
As Vikram David Amar has pointed out in these pages, the Incompatibility Clause (Art. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
See generally Michael Stern, Amarica's Constitutional Crisis: A Kinda Intellectual History of the Office/Officer Controversy, Point of Order (Jan. 5, 2024), <http://tinyurl.com/6xu6x43r> (listing Akhil Amar's former-student protegees, e.g., Professor Kalt, Professor Chafetz, and Benjamin Cassady). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Relatedly, Michael Stern wrote "there is no record of anyone else, eminent thinker or otherwise, saying" that the President does not hold an Office under the United States "in the Constitution's first two centuries. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 7:42 am
Three of them were with Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
This week, professors Vikram Amar and Michael Dorf, both of whom possess extensive legal knowledge and experience, are set to deliver a members-only look at some of the most talked-about cases on the Court’s upcoming docket. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
For more on double jeopardy, read: Amar, Akhil Reed. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 11:08 pm
Amar & Akhil Amar, Is the Presidential Succession Law Constitutional? [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:08 pm
" [Here, Amar was referring to his two earlier podcasts in which he interviewed Professors Will Baude and Michael Stokes Paulsen.] [read post]
