Search for: "Michael B. Rappaport"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Rappaport, Michael Asaro, Parvin Daphne Moyne, and Brian Daly. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 6:30 am
Rappaport, Michael Asaro, Parvin Daphne Moyne, and Brian Daly. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Melnick David Michaels Celeste Monforton Albert Miller Brautbar Nachman Christopher Portier Steven B. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
., Jack Michael Beermann, Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron and the Anti-Innovation Supreme Court at 8 (March 9, 2023) (“This article also illustrates how the Court is doing a poor job providing clear instructions to lower courts and other government entities on how and in some cases even whether to apply its doctrines. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:48 pm
Bremer Chevron and Originalism: Why Chevron Deference Cannot Be Grounded in the Original Meaning of the Administrative Procedure Act by Michael B. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
Introduction There are many different theories of constitutional interpretation, but the most controversial and also perhaps the most influential is "originalism. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 8:55 am
McGinnis (Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law) & Michael B. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 10:45 am
Michael B. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:50 pm
McGinnis & Michael B. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 6:00 am
John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport have argued that constitutional construction is unnecessary. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 2:05 pm
Keywords: polarization, presidency, administrative state, delegation, war powers, executive agreement JEL Classification: k10, k19 Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation McGinnis, John and Rappaport, Michael B., Presidential Polarization (February 18, 2021). [read post]
30 May 2021, 10:48 am
Recent Developments in Asbestos, Talc, Silica, Tobacco, and E-Cigarette/Vaping Litigation in the U.S. and Canada (George Gigounas, Arthur Hoffmann, David Jaroslaw, Amy Pressman, Nancy Shane Rappaport, Wendy Michael, Christopher Gismondi, Stephen H. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:46 pm
B. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:38 pm
I think the arguments advanced by Ramsey, myself, and Michael Rappaport (in an earlier iteration of the debate over the Air Force) are enough to dispose of this critique of originalism. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:07 am
Michael B. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 8:07 am
Michael B. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:50 am
– Akhil Amar and John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport; see also this directly relevant essay by Rappaport) do not claim that such applications automatically trump other considerations; they still leave considerable room for adjustment to changing factual circumstances. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Michael B. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:46 am
Michael B. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 7:14 am
For example, John McGinnis and Michael Rappaport have developed a thoughtful argument that when the Constitution's text and history are unclear, judges should invoke interpretive assumptions that existed at the time of ratification. [read post]
