Search for: "Michael David Scott v. State of Arkansas" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Both states saw major increases in cigarette smuggling. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Over the same period, inbound smuggling decreased in nearby Arkansas, from 6.3 percent to 2.3 percent, suggesting that Oklahoma’s tax increase impacted interstate smuggling. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Excessive tax rates on cigarettes approach de facto prohibition in some states, inducing black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Most state officials are just trying to keep voter lists clean, said David Becker, executive directo [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Can Learn from France Michael Sinha, Harvard Medical School [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Since Brookings published the report in May 2016, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Texas, and Utah have all criminalized sextortion. [read post]
31 May 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Jeff Ifrah and David Yellen look at Murphy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Property tax limitations have been adopted in forty-six states and the District of Columbia, though their designs and restrictiveness differ widely. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Scott, merely cited “the reasons set out in Obergefell” to invalidate that state’s birth certificate rule. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, the justices summarily ordered Arkansas to provide names of same-sex partners on birth certificates. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
”  And at The Guardian, Scott Lemieux describes the decision as “good news, but” also “a qualified victory,” because it “leaves open the possibility that states could undermine ‘one person, one vote,’ and at least some red state legislatures are likely to try it. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 1:03 am by INFORRM
On 15 January 2016 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of McGrath v Bedford. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am by Conor McEvily
At PrawfsBlawg Michael Waterstone analyzes the Court’s opinion in Coleman v. [read post]