Search for: "Michal v. Michal"
Results 1 - 20
of 149
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm
When expert witnesses rely upon one or a few studies, which telegraph internal validity, this litigation strategy may provide the strongest evidence against the study’s being reasonably relied upon, or its providing “sufficient facts and data” to support an admissible expert witness opinion. [1] Daubert v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:15 am
University of Virginia School of Law Professor Michal Barzuza fears that they might be in a recently posted a draft of her upcoming article entitled "Nevada v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
In Morgan v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm
Chubin et al. at 10, Daubert v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am
Here, the factual allegations in the complaint, even as amplified by the plaintiffs’ evidentiary submissions in opposition to the defendants’ motion, were insufficient to establish that the defendants acted with intent to deceive the plaintiffs or the court (see Cordell Marble Falls, LLC v Kelly, 191 AD3d at 762; Michalic v Klat, 128 AD2d 505, 506; Shaffer v Gilberg, 125 AD3d 632, 636). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm
Supreme Court’s ruling in Biden v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
, Best v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
The article responds to the recent decision of Abbasi & ors v Newcastle NHS Trust & ors. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
On 20 December 2022, Chamberlain J heard costs applications in Wright v McCormack. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
IPSO 02303-22 A woman v gloucestershirelive, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 09504-22 Hunter v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), No breach – after investigation 09505-22 Hunter v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 10 Clandestine devices and subterfuge (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement – 12008-22 A man v mylondon.news, 1… [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 6:12 am
Contents include:Special Issue: Judicial Activism in an Age of Populism Zoltán Szente & Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz, The impact of populism on constitutional interpretation in the EU Member States Michal Kovalčík, The instrumental abuse of constitutional courts: how populists can use constitutional courts against the opposition Jan Petrov, (De-)judicialization of politics in the era of populism: lessons from Central and Eastern Europe Max Steuer, Authoritarian… [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 6:19 am
Climate Change Discourse in the United NationsTyler Jost, Kaine Meshkin, & Robert Schub, The Character and Origins of Military Attitudes on the Use of ForcePedro Seabra & Rafael Mesquita, Beyond Roll-Call Voting: Sponsorship Dynamics at the UN General AssemblyClara Egger & Doris Schopper, Organizations Involved in Humanitarian Action: Introducing a New Dataset Douglas M Gibler & Steven V Miller, An Appraisal of Project Mars and the Divided Armies ArgumentBryce W Reeder,… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm
On 17 May 2022, judgment was handed down in Wright v Granath [2022] EWHC 1181 (QB) by Lewis J. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:23 am
In the 2020 decision for National Association of Wheat Growers et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm
On Tuesday 12 April 2022, there were hearings in the cases of BW Legal Services Limited v Glassdoor, Inc before Jay J; Dudley v Phillips before Saini J, and; XXX v Persons Unknown before Chamberlain J. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm
Benner and Michal R. [read post]
