Search for: "Michigan v. King" Results 1 - 20 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
This week the Tenth Circuit vacates that opinion and requests supplemental briefing on how the Supreme Court's recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign states,… [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 1:24 pm by kblocher@hslf.org
In November 2020, the agency filed a complaint against big cat exhibitors Jeffrey and Lauren Lowe (of “Tiger King” notoriety) for Animal Welfare Act and Endangered Species Act violations (United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm by Barbara McQuade
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 5:01 am by Anthony Sanders
—The King & I The post Baby Ninth Amendments Part V: Real Life, Potpourri, and the Big Picture appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Oklahoma; Certificate of Appealability) In re Gold King Mine Release in San Juan County, Colorado, on August 5, 2015 (CERCLA; Natural Resource Damages) Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]