Search for: "Miles et al v. Federal Insurance Company et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2023, 4:58 am
The Heartland Group Ventures LLC et al. explains what a receiver under federal law has the right to do. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
In § 6, I discuss an important recent study by Kimberly Rauscher ScD, MA, et al. , entitled “Prevalence of Workplace Violence Against Young Workers in the United States,” published in the American Journal of Industrial Medicine , Volume 66, Issue 6 [pp. 462-471]. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
From an insurance coverage standpoint, private equity sponsors and their insurers should ensure that the outside director or executive coverage of their general partnership insurance policies as well as the portfolio company’s insurance policies consider that certain individuals may constitute “acting managers” of a portfolio company and evaluate whether existing policy language is sufficient to account for such potential… [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 8:44 am
DermaTran Health Solutions, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-CV-1765. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
There is also a private right of action for shareholders to pursue claims for violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 in federal court. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
” In Huang et al, v. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 6:07 pm
Salzburg et al. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Usuga-Norena et al., 05-CR-135 (S.D.N.Y.); and U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 10:30 am
Usuga-Norena et al., 05-CR-135 (S.D.N.Y.); and U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 6:22 am
Next Door Company et al., ruled F.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Indian Harbor Insurance Co. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:43 am
Farm employers are not subject to many federal labor laws and, in many states, are not included within the scope of the state workers' compensation provisions. [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:23 pm
METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER, INC., et al. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
BAVARO, et al., Appellees. 5th District.Civil rights -- Florida Civil Rights Act prohibits pregnancy discrimination in employmentPEGUY DELVA, Petitioner, v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 12:58 pm
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL., Appellees/Cross-Claimants/plaintiffs. 3rd District.Appeals -- Timeliness -- Untimely motion for rehearing did not toll rendition of final order for purposes of appeal -- Appeal dismissedIVORY MILES, JR., Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
CALLAGHAN, et al., Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Employment -- Non-competition agreement -- Injunction -- Where non-compete agreement provided that employee shall not own, manage, operate, control, be employed by, assist, participate in, or have any material interest in any business or profession engaged in general equine veterinary practice located within thirty-mile radius of employer's business address for two years after termination of employment, and after… [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Supreme Court decision in Stern v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 4:38 am
http://j.st/cE4 View Case on: Justia Google Scholar Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, et al v. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am
Not only that, but since a federal bankruptcy judge still cannot modify a mortgage by lowering payments or extending the term, Claudia had darn fine reason to rely on the bank’s promise to help her reinstate her loan, and provide her with more favorable terms. [read post]
