Search for: "Miller v. City of Sacramento" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Third District Rejects CEQA and Other Challenges to Department of Water Resources’ EIR for Amendments Extending Long-Term State Water Project Supply Contracts Through 2085
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Holds Increased Enrollment-Related CEQA Challenges To UC Regents’ 2018 SEIR For Berkeley Campus Development And Minor LRDP Amendment Are Mooted By Superseding 2021 LRDP Update EIR And Passage Of SB 118
30 May 2023, 5:02 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 837, 854), and “has not cited any authority suggesting the Legislature cannot prioritize access to education via enrollment levels over certain environmental concerns. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A “Capitol” Offense: Third District Holds State Capitol Building Annex/Visitor Center Protect EIR Violated CEQA Due To Inadequate Project Description And Analyses Of Historical Cultural Impacts, Aesthetics, And Project Alternatives
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Los Angeles (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 185, 193, 199; South of Market Community Action Network v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“This Woeful Record”: First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA Challenges To Marin County’s Approval of 43-Home Mountaintop Subdivision Opposed For Nearly Five Decades By Neighbors And Town of Tiburon
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Holds CEQA Does Not Authorize “Remedy” of “Limited EIR” To Augment Deficient MND; Rather, Full EIR Must Be Prepared Where Substantial Evidence Supports Fair Argument That Any Aspect Of Project May Have Significant Environmental Effect
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of Santa Cruz (2015) 241 Cal.App.4th 694, 704-705; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Affirms Judgment Upholding State Lands Commission’s Supplemental EIR For Desalination Plant Lease Modification, Rejects CEQA Claims That Commission Piecemealed Review And Should Have Assumed Lead Agency Status And Prepared A Subsequent EIR
11 May 2021, 11:48 am by Arthur F. Coon
  California Coastkeeper Alliance v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The case is Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Affirms Judgment Invalidating City of Agoura Hills’ Mixed-Use Project Approvals and Related MND Based On CEQA and Local Oak Tree Ordinance Violations
27 Mar 2020, 6:32 pm by Arthur F. Coon
”  (City of Long Beach v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA Challenges To EIR For Cordova Hills Master Planned Community Project
6 Mar 2020, 2:54 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Environmental Council of Sacramento v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“ROG Won: A CEQA Wars Story” – Third District Holds Geothermal Energy Project EIR’s Rejection Of Proposed Mitigation Measures For Significant ROG Fugitive Emissions Impact Violated CEQA Where No Substantial Evidence Showed Measures’ Infeasibility
3 Jan 2020, 3:29 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 413, 418; Sacramento Old City Assn. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Out With The Old (And In With The New … Next Year)! – Third District Rejects CEQA And General Plan Consistency Challenges to Sacramento’s 2035 General Plan Update And Related EIR, Holds Traffic Analysis Challenge Based On Lowering of Acceptable LOS Is Mooted By Public Resources Code § 20199, But New VMT Standard Doesn’t Yet Apply
23 Dec 2019, 1:36 pm by Arthur F. Coon
The City of Sacramento received an early Christmas present with the December 18 publication of the Third District Court of Appeal’s opinion in Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Affirms Judgment Upholding MND for Rural Sonoma County Winery Project, Holds Unsubstantiated Expert Opinion Fails to Support Fair Argument of Geologic, Erosion Or Groundwater Impacts
28 Oct 2019, 1:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 928, internal quotes omitted), and “[t]he petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate by citation to the record the existence of substantial evidence supporting a fair argument of significant environmental impact. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To Chico Walmart Expansion Project EIR’s Urban Decay Analysis And City’s Statement Of Overriding Considerations
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Not A CEQA “Project”? Not So Fast, Lead Agency! Supreme Court Reverses Fourth District’s Decision That San Diego’s Adoption of Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ordinance Was Not A Project Requiring CEQA Review
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Upholds Sustainable Communities Environmental Assessment (SCEA) Used Instead Of Traditional CEQA Document To Approve High-Rise, High-Density Mixed-Use Condo Housing Project In Sacramento’s Midtown
19 Jul 2019, 4:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Sacramentans for Fair Planning v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
When CEQA Gets Ugly: Third District Holds Lay Public Opinion Supports Fair Argument That Project May Have Significant Aesthetic Effect Requiring EIR
18 Dec 2018, 5:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 939.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Why California Cannot Dictate to Whom the Federal Government Sells Federal Lands
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
(That is why Alabama could not impose tax or regulatory burdens on people who chose to provide services to the federal civil rights agencies, and also why the City of Berkeley cannot punish entities that assist the federal government in building a border wall by disqualifying them from doing business with the City.) [read post]
Verdict - http://verdict.justia.com/
2018 CEQA Fall Update: Recent Legislative, Judicial, And Other Developments
24 Oct 2018, 3:45 pm by Arthur F. Coon
 The case is Save Lafayette Trees v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Arguing Impacts By Proxy: Fourth District Holds CEQA Does Not Require EIR Absent Evidence That Subdivision Approval Actually Violated Applicable Land Use Regulations Adopted to Mitigate Environmental Impacts
19 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Friends of Riverside’s Hills v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Tribute: Formidable teacher, friend and still “somewhat of an enigma”
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Sionaidh Douglas-Scott
In 2003, in Lawrence v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/