Search for: "Mitchell S. Brown"
Results 1 - 20
of 468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 3:00 am
” Albany spokesperson Brennen Brown said the water board did not know if radioactive alum mud from Stauffer was dumped in the city’s landfill, “and no prior investigation has indicated any actionable public health and safety issues. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:00 am
The letter was sent the same week Trump’s hush-money trial began in New York. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 5:27 am
Andrea Mitchell reports for NBC News. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 4:42 am
Mitchell McCluskey and Charbel Mallo report for CNN. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
After all, Chief Justice Warren achieved unanimity in Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:03 pm
Mitchell argued against the ATF’s final rule. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:41 pm
When Fletcher’s answer was yes, Kavanaugh shot back, “That’s going to ensnare a lot of people. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Asked by Justice Elena Kagan during the oral argument what possible purpose the Reconstruction Congress that proposed the Fourteenth Amendment could have had for excluding Presidents-turned-insurrectionists from Section 3’s coverage, Trump’s lawyer Jonathan Mitchell admitted that there was no good rationale for doing so. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed skeptical about one argument made by Trump’s attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, that Chief Justice Samuel Chase’s circuit court decision in Griffin required Congress to pass enabling legislation to allow states to disqualify insurrectionists. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
Indeed, the amazing thing about the oral argument was just how hilariously nonchalant Jackson was with regard the mass of historical materials by lawyers and non-lawyers she had been furnished; she even had Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell disclaiming “law office history” to avoid using history to serve his side so crudely. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
From Slate:If there was any surprise on Thursday, it was Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s embrace of Mitchell’s main theory that the president is not an “officer” of the United States, so Section 3 does not apply to him at all. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
Liquidating Griffin's Case Later, Justice Kavanaugh tried to salvage Mitchell's argument about Griffin's Case. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
” Finally, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also showed some skepticism about Murray’s arguments, emphasizing that because the office of the president is not explicitly included in the list of offices that fall under Section 3’s requirements, why should the court res [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" This was Mitchell's clearest statement on point. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
When Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell was questioned, none of the justices asked about whether Trump’s actions constituted an insurrection until Jackson raised it in her final question. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
At times it seemed like Jackson was Trump's lawyer and Mitchell was Colorado's lawyer. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:03 pm
Accordingly, today’s final rules will remove safe harbor protections[1] and add additional disclosure requirements for projections used in association with de-SPAC transactions. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Mitchell, The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy, 104 Va. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:22 pm
Mitchell (1993). [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Trump's presidency. [read post]
