Search for: "Mitchell v. Jackson"
Results 1 - 20
of 181
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 11:02 am
As Jonathan Mitchell explains, and Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:30 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
The future Solicitor General and Office of Legal Counsel should take note of the questioning from Justice Gorsuch and Justice Jackson during the Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 8:46 am
The most that the Sotomayor-Kagan-Jackson opinion can summon to criticize Chase was to point out that Trump's counsel, Jonathan Mitchell, "distanced himself from fully embracing" Griffin's Case. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In short, the court concluded in LePage v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
During last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:46 am
For Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
" The second installment focused on Justice Jackson's colloquies about "Office under the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:02 pm
“Oral Arguments in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 12:46 pm
Kirtz and Murray v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
During oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
When Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell was questioned, none of the justices asked about whether Trump’s actions constituted an insurrection until Jackson raised it in her final question. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
At times it seemed like Jackson was Trump's lawyer and Mitchell was Colorado's lawyer. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Trump is represented in the Supreme Court by Jonathan Mitchell, the architect of Texas’s controversial six-week abortion ban. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Mitchell, The Writ-of-Erasure Fallacy, 104 Va. [read post]