Search for: "Monday v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 4,869
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) stated on Monday that the State of Palestine filed an application to intervene in South Africa v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Amy Howe
United States, the justices agreed to weigh in on a federal sentencing law that imposes a mandatory minimum sentence for anyone who carries a gun during a “crime of violence. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has won a bid to bring an appeal against his extradition to the United States. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
United States A Florida judge has denied an attempt by the former T-Mobile chief executive John Legere to dismiss a $100m defamation suit brought again [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
United States TikTok and ByteDance have initiated legal action against the US government, challenging a recently enacted law that would ban TikTok unless ByteDance sells the company off in the next nine months to an entity not controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]
Starbucks (10(j) Relief Standard):  On April 23, 2024, oral argument before the United States Supreme Court took place in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am by Tim K. Garrett and Maja Hartzell
In a recent decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a lateral job transfer can – in certain circumstances – be an illegal adverse action and support a claim for a lawsuit for unlawful discrimination. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm by Amy Howe
The justices heard two cases in the 2023-2024 term involving guns: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
United States On 11 April 2024, the Colorado Court of Appeals found that Section 230 immunity applied to two retweets from Donald Trump and his son about a Dominion Voting employee that said he was going to make sure Trump would not win the 2020 election, Coomer v Donald J. [read post]