Search for: "Moore v. Regents of University of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Since declaring affirmative action in admissions to be unconstitutional in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
See Moore-King v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
In 1990, the California Supreme Court basically decided in Moore v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:52 pm
In 1990, the California Supreme Court basically decided in Moore v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
Regents of the University of California, 167-177 Notes, 177-178 [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am
Regents of the University of California, a challenge to the government’s decision to terminate the DACA program, will “be important in defining the court’s relationship to a president who behaves as if he has the Supreme Court in his pocket,” because “[it] will indicate whether the Roberts court — more specifically, the chief justice himself — will continue to insist on believable explanations from an administration that often… [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Regents of Univ. of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990) (property interest in one’s genetic material)15. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587, Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am
Moor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
In 1943 and 1944, he was an instructor in aeriel navigation and physical education for Naval Officers enrolled at UVA under the V-12 program. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
With advances in computer technology making genetic testing exponentially cheaper and more detailed as times passes (see Moore’s law), more and more genetic variability in the efficacy of prescription drugs is bound to be discovered. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 7:46 am
Regents of the University of California, the 1990 California Supreme Court case that found that Mr. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am
Regents of the University of Michigan, et al. (6th Cir., Case Nos. 08-1387/1389/1534 & 09-1111, Nov. 15, 2012) (PDF). [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
Regents of the University of California, the famous 1993 California Supreme Court ruling that a person has no property right in his excised spleen. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica) District Court… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 7:20 pm
This case reminds me of the landmark case of Moore v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 9:39 pm
Regents of the University of California (holding that a patient who consented to removal of his cells did not have a property interest in those cells) was wrongly decided, and that a person should have a property right in cells that are removed from his or her body. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
App. 2002)] (ruling that statements at issue in newspaper article relating to software manufacturer’s copyright infringement action against local retailer addressed public concern of software privacy, and therefore retailer was required, despite being a private figure plaintiff, to prove in defamation action that publisher acted with actual malice, i.e., that it acted with actual knowledge of falsity, or with reckless disregard as to the truth or falsity, of the story); Nadel v… [read post]
