Search for: "Morgan Stanley Dean Witter and Co" Results 1 - 20 of 24
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2023, 7:02 am by Zamansky LLC
In 1997, Morgan Stanley acquired two businesses from Sears—Dean Witter and Discover Card. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no single statute of limitations for causes of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; Matter of Hersh, 198 AD3d [*2]766, 769). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
With respect to the breach of fiduciary duty causes of action, “where an allegation of fraud is essential to a breach of fiduciary duty claim, courts have applied a six-year statute of limitations under CPLR 213 (8)” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009], rearg denied 12 NY3d 889 [2009]; see Monaghan v Ford Motor Co., 71 AD3d 848, 849-850 [2d Dept 2010]). [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 1:04 pm by Tom Smith
He was vice president for corporate security at Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. and a jumbo jet had just plowed into the other tower.As smoke rose from Tower One, someone from the Port Authority ordered him to keep his people at their desks. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:33 am by Alan Rosca
He then switched to Dean Witter Reynolds located in Purchase, New York from May 1992 until June 1999. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 4:33 am by Alan Rosca
He then switched to Dean Witter Reynolds located in Purchase, New York from May 1992 until June 1999. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Alan Rosca
  Michael Carter was also registered with Morgan Stanley & Co Incorporated between April 2007 and June 2009. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
They state a claim for malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty–both of which have a three-year statute of limitations because defendants exclusively seek monetary damages (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]; Matter of R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541 [2004]). [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009).) [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” As such, we find no abuse of discretion in Supreme Court’s determination that a three-year limitations period applies to defendant’s breach of fiduciary duty claim, which seeks purely monetary relief (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To determine timeliness, we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint must, as a matter of law, be read to allege damages suffered so early as to render the claim time-barred” IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132,139 [2009]. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the appellant's counterclaims against those defendants were time-barred (see CPLR 213[1], [7]; 214[4], [6]; IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; North Fork Preserve, Inc. v Kaplan, 31 AD3d 403, 405). [read post]