Search for: "Morgan v. Morgan" Results 1 - 20 of 3,794
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that they did not owe a special duty of care to the plaintiff (see Koyko v City of New York, 189 AD3d at 812; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d at 698). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the defendants established, prima facie, that they did not owe a special duty of care to the plaintiff (see Koyko v City of New York, 189 AD3d at 812; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068; Destefano v City of New York, 149 AD3d at 698). [read post]
19 May 2024, 10:13 pm by INFORRM
She confirmed her identity as the woman portrayed in the series in a recent interview with Piers Morgan. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
 Morgan Stanley, 776 F.3d 94 (2d Cir. 2015), which gave rise to the circuit split that Macquarie resolved. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Morgan Kousser, Emeritus, California Institute of Technology, have signed a Historians’ Amicus Brief in Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account approval… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply the… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division  could not supply the… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: After the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Unknown
Those disclosure failures meant that the minority stockholders were not adequately informed, and that the transaction was not eligible for the safe harbor of the MFW framework (City of Dearborn Police and Fire Revised Retirement System (Chapter 23) v. [read post]