Search for: "Morgan v. Wal-Mart, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2016, 11:06 am by Allyson Ho and Scott Schutte
One well-publicized instance of the Court’s caution came in reversing certification of the “largest class action in history” in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United… [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm by Law Lady
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., Appellee. 5th District.Venue -- Where settlement agreement, which had settled foreclosure action by mortgagor assigning to mortgagee 50 percent of the net proceeds awarded for damages in mortgagor's action against its insurance carrier in Miami-Dade County, contained mandatory venue selection provision requiring any litigation between mortgagor and mortgagee to be tried in Osceola County, trial court erred in denying motion to enforce the venue selection… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 2:23 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Morgan Chase Hit For $461M For Madoff-Related Bank Secrecy Act Violations Dermatology Practice To Pay $150K To Settle Charges It Breached  HIPAA Breach Notice Rule Employer Faces $2M F [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Fox, a former OFCCP official and current president of Fox, Wang & Morgan P.C. in San Jose, California. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 9:19 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
With an eye to the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc v Dukes, the court determined that the plaintiffs could not show anything more than a uniform policy by Hearst of utilizing unpaid internships. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:20 am by Lorene Park
For example, in Muhammad v Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, a federal court sua sponte sanctioned an employee’s attorney who tried to avoid summary judgment by “disingenuously” arguing that an unpleaded gender bias claim had merit and could be pursued simply because the employee checked the Title VII box on his form complaint (WDNY 2012). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118, 1127 (Ill. 2002) (applied to pharmacists); Hansen v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Problem areas include what “unaware” means, the exclusion of electronic communications such as emails and the very broad common law definition of “publication” which has not changed since Duke of Brunswick v Hamer (1849) 14 QB 185. [read post]