Search for: "Mosee v. Clark" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 260.550(1)—laws that are likewise potentially justifiable on the grounds that they deal with narrow and easily verifiable factual assertions—Mosee v. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Times and Mail Online have apologised to the chairman of BAFTA after falsely claiming he had “close links” with actor Noel Clarke. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
The program for the annual meeting of the American Society for Legal History, to be held in Boston, November 21-24, 2019, has been announced. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am by Alfred Brophy
  This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972,  Taylor v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
Barcelo III, Substantive and Procedural Arbitrability in Ad Hoc Investor-State Arbitration — BG Group v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:58 am by Charles Moses
Supreme Court’s recent unanimous decision in Clark v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
  At the end of the book, Professor Ackerman disarmingly acknowledges that he’s “fail[ed] to integrate the voices of movement activists,” but I believe the failure distorts the story he tells, for an accurate list of crucial catalysts would include many women, such as Diane Nash, Septima Clark, Autherine Lucy, Ida Wells-Barnett, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates, and Pauli Murray (to name just a few) as well as John Lewis,… [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
  At the end of the book, Professor Ackerman disarmingly acknowledges that he’s “fail[ed] to integrate the voices of movement activists,” but I believe the failure distorts the story he tells, for an accurate list of crucial catalysts would include many women, such as Diane Nash, Septima Clark, Autherine Lucy, Ida Wells-Barnett, Jo Ann Gibson Robinson, Ella Baker, Fannie Lou Hamer, Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates, and Pauli Murray (to name just a few) as well as John Lewis,… [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
And there’s the literature that continued in the late 1960s and early 1970s to seek an answer in more traditional or different places, like Kenneth Clark’s Dark Ghetto (1967). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
Judgment The judgment of the court was given by Lord Reed, with whom the rest of their Lordships (Lord Neuberger, Baroness Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) agreed. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am by Mark Spinney, Olswang LLP
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804)  that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
Modi v Clarke, heard 22 June 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ). [read post]