Search for: "Mr. C" Results 1 - 20 of 11,175
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 22 February 2024, Master Dagnall handed down judgment in Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc [2024] EWHC 389 (KB) in relation to an article (“the Article”) first published on 22 May 2021 by Journalism Development Network Inc and written by Mr Daniel Balint-Kurti and Mr William Jordan (“the Defendants”). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
Call Now 1-866-939-5940Overview of the Offence Uttering threats is covered under s.264.1 of the Criminal Code: (1) Every one commits an offence who, in any manner, knowingly utters, conveys or causes any person to receive a threat (a) to cause death or bodily harm to any person; (b) to burn, destroy or damage real or personal property; or (c) to kill, poison or injure an animal or bird that is the property of any person. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Jon May
This chapter is presented in advance of publication by the ABA to encourage review and comment on the author’s thesis so that he can identify any errors of fact or thought that ought to be corrected.There is a small but growing movement to remove any reference to zealous advocacy from ethical codes. [read post]
29 May 2024, 5:46 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
Copyright protection presupposes that the allegedly infringed work is sufficiently original (i.e., Funke Medien, C-469/17, at [23]). [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Chancery Division by Mr Justice Mellor in conclusion of Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright [2024] EWHC 1198 (Ch). [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am by Michael C. Dorf
Readers could be forgiven for thinking that the title of today's essay is chiefly meant to invoke the two pro-insurrection flags flown by Justice and Mrs. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:45 am by Norman L. Eisen
Last week, both the prosecution and the defense rested their cases in former President Donald Trump’s New York trial for allegedly falsifying business records (FBR) in his effort “to unlawfully influence the 2016 presidential election,” in the words of Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan’s case summary. [read post]