Search for: "Mummery"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2022, 10:36 am
For anyone who has spent hours doom scrolling on Instagram or Twitter, and your algorithm is set up like the AmeriKat's, you may have seen ads for leather riding boots. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:03 pm
Christine Mummery, president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research, praised the decision as a “return to evidence-based policymaking. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 6:31 am
This has been similarly reflected in Sawkins v Hyperion [2005] EWCA Civ 565, where it was set out by Mummery LJ that: a work need only be ‘original’ in the limited sense that the author originated it by his efforts rather than slavishly copying it from the work produced by the efforts of another person.It had been identified that the main creators of the Works had drawn inspiration from art deco, and whilst the elements - when considered individually - were generic, the… [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
(Mummery LJ, [31]). [read post]
14 May 2018, 9:23 am
Source: www.nytimes.com By Colin Mummery Download full note here. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Although it was obvious for the AmeriKatto try being nice to Merpel, she knewthere was little expectation of success...Unpredictable. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
Burchell has nevertheless acquired authoritative status, initially through its approval (as an unreported case) by this court in Weddel and Co v Tepper [1980] ICR 286, and more recently by its endorsement in the judgment of Mummery LJ in Foley v Post Office [2000] ICR 1283. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:50 am
It is sufficient for the claimant to be affected by the court's determination: see Rolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union[2009] EWCA Civ 387, [2010] 1 WLR 318 at [120] (Aikens LJ), Feetum v Levy [2005] EWCA Civ 1601, [2006] Ch 585 at [82] (Jonathan Parker LJ) and Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 270, [2012] 1 P&CR 3 at [44] (Mummery LJ). [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 11:39 am
Consequently, the Court held, it was invalid.AnalysisOne can see shades (sorry) of the Cadburys judgment in HHJ Hacon’s thinking and indeed the Judge set out Sir John Mummery’s excellent precis of the key principles that could be distilled from the various CJEU decisions on colour mark registrations as part of his judgment. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 4:53 am
"Sir John Mummery held that— [55] “the description of the mark as including not just the colour purple as a sign, but other signs, in which the colour purple predominates over other colours and other matter, means that the mark described is not “a sign”. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
" Professor David Ormerod (2005) "a complex and difficult piece of legislation" Mummery LJ (then President of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, 2006) "RIPA 2000 is a difficult statute to understand" (Sir Anthony May, IOCC Report for 2013) "RIPA, obscure since its inception, has been patched up so many times as to make it incomprehensible to all but a tiny band of initiates" (David Anderson Q.C., A Question of Trust, 2015.)Unintelligibility… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
" Professor David Ormerod (2005) "a complex and difficult piece of legislation" Mummery LJ (then President of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, 2006) "RIPA 2000 is a difficult statute to understand" (Sir Anthony May, IOCC Report for 2013) "RIPA, obscure since its inception, has been patched up so many times as to make it incomprehensible to all but a tiny band of initiates" (David Anderson Q.C., A Question of Trust, 2015.)Unintelligibility… [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
" Professor David Ormerod (2005) "a complex and difficult piece of legislation" Mummery LJ (then President of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, 2006) "RIPA 2000 is a difficult statute to understand" (Sir Anthony May, IOCC Report for 2013) "RIPA, obscure since its inception, has been patched up so many times as to make it incomprehensible to all but a tiny band of initiates" (David Anderson Q.C., A Question of Trust, 2015.)Unintelligibility… [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 6:17 am
As the rest of the parade shrinks, the freshest, fastest-growing part of modern mummery is the oldest - wenches. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 3:22 pm
” In Francis v Philips [2014] EWCA Civ 1395, at [74], there is reference to a “broad principle” which could be detected in service charge cases, that: ” … it is reasonable to expect that, if the parties to a lease intend that the lessor shall be entitled to receive payment from the tenant in addition to the rent, that obligation and its extent will be clearly spelled out in the lease: see, for example, Gilje v Charlgrove Securities… [read post]
22 Aug 2015, 1:38 am
There is a link below.On Thursday September 10th, the British Literary and Artistic Copyright Association, BLACA (which provides a forum for discussion of matters affecting the rights of authors and other copyright owners and is the UK national group of the International Literary and Artistic Association) hosts Sir John Mummery speaking on the Impact in the UK of Court of Justice European of the European Union rulings. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:09 am
(Click image to enlarge.)That's all from a comments thread to a post I put up at Instapundit at 5:01 p.m. yesterday titled "MUMMERIES, PUTSCH, AND HUBRIS," which cherry-picked the language related material from yesterday's post — here on the home blog — that went through everything in Justice Scalia's dissenting opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:36 pm
" (A "mummery" is a "Ridiculous ceremony (formerly used esp. of religious ritual regarded as pretentious or hypocritical). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:38 pm
” … “Buried beneath the mummeries and straining-to-be-memorable passages of the opinion is a candid and startling assertion: No matter what it was the People ratified, the Fourteenth Amendment protects those rights that the Judiciary, in its ‘reasoned judgment,’ thinks the Fourteenth Amendment ought to protect. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 7:53 am
Scalia, as is his wont, issued a more scathing concurrence to Roberts, excoriating the “mummeries” of the majority: We have no basis for striking down a practice that is not expressly prohibited by the Fourteenth Amendment’s text, and that bears the endorsement of a long tradition of open, widespread, and unchallenged use dating back to the Amendment’s ratification. [read post]
