Search for: "Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2020, 3:24 pm by Michael Campbell and Allison Cheffer
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094 (2007)), and relied on the revised piece-rate statute, Section 226.2, which became effective in 2016. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Kenneth Cole Products, Inc., which held that “the section 226.7 payment[] uses the employee’s rate of compensation,” and not the employee’s “regular rate” used for overtime purposes. [read post]
4 May 2012, 6:28 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal.4th 1094, 1102 (2007) (holding that Section 226.7 payment is “wage”). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:11 pm by AALRR
Kenneth Cole Productions, in which the court held that the penalties recoverable under Labor Code section 226.7 for meal or rest period violations are "a 'wage' for purposes of determining what statute of limitations applies to section 226.7 claims. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:53 am by Matt C. Bailey
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal. 4th 1094 (2007) establishes that an action for recovery of the statutory remedies for missed meal and rest breaks is a claim for “nonpayment of wages” within the meaning of Labor Code section 218.5. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:42 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc., 40 Cal. 4th 1094 (2007) that meal and rest break premium pay is itself a form of  overtime compensation. [read post]