Search for: "Murray v. IRS"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
For example, in Hanahoe v Hussey [1998] 3 IR 69, [1997] IEHC 173 (14 November 1997) and Gray v Minister for Justice [2007] 2 IR 654, [2007] IEHC 52 (17 January 2007) (extensively discussed here, here, and here), the plaintiffs recovered damages in respect of leaks by Gardaí of their private information. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
There being two legitimate aims, the next question was whether the restriction was proportionate to them; the means chosen to achieve those aim must (a) be rationally connected to the objective and not be arbitrary, unfair or based on irrational considerations, (b) impair the right as little as possible, and (c) be such that their effects on rights are proportional to the objective … (Murphy v IRTC [46] (Barrington J), following Heaney v Ireland [1994] 3… [read post]
3 May 2022, 12:06 pm
This notifies the IRS that the executor is responsible for the estate’s tax filings and the decedent’s final tax return(s).[60] Estate Tax. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
Sen Jon Tester reintroduced the Spotlight Act, which would require nonprofits to reveal their major donors to the IRS. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
The leading cases on the nature and extent of the constitutional right to freedom of expression at Irish law are Irish Times v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359, [1998] 2 ILRM 161 (2 April 1998) (doc | pdf) and Murphy v Independent Radio and Television Commission [1999] 1 IR 12, [1998] 2 ILRM 360 (28 May 1998) (doc | pdf) (which I have considered here); but the insights in these cases have not been applied to or in the defamation… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
Feeney J effectively held that the plaintiff was entitled to ordinary compensatory damages, but he failed to appreciate that such damages include damages for distress (Conway v Ireland [1991] 2 IR 305, 317, [1991] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ; Griffin J and McCarthy JJ concurring); Shortt v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2007] 4 IR 587, 612, [2007] IESC 9 (21 March 2007) [82] (Murray CJ), [2007] 4 IR 587,… [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
But some of the provisions have drawn the ire of nonprofits that warn it will deal a significant blow to their fundraising. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:14 pm
Five years later the Florida Supreme Court, in Emma Murray v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am
Back in 2004, Californian state senator Kevin Murray wrote this in a report in US recording industry practices:“Much like the public generally dislikes politicians, but love their individual representatives, Artists have respect for their record company handlers, but distrust the companies themselves and the system they operate under. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 9:50 am
Colo. 2013); Murray v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:51 pm
Both Justice Raye and Justice Murray, however, also write concurring opinions. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm
Patty Murray of Washington; Sen. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Nussbaum (1) Bernard-Henry Lévy (3) Bert Parks (1) Bertrand Russell (1) Bessie Smith (1) Best of the Web (7) bestiality (14) Beta Rube (1) betamax3000 (18) Beth (the commenter) (9) Bette Davis (14) Bette Midler (1) Betty Friedan (8) Betty White (1) Beyonce (18) Bhutan (2) Bianca Jagger (1) Bible (40) Biddy Martin (13) biden (177) Biden gaffes (21) Biff (1) big and small (5) Big Government sounds like a creepy stalker (10) Big Hollywood (1) Big Mike (1) bigotry (22) biking (160) bikini (18)… [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am
There was an application in the case of Murray v Care on 20 February 2013. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Joseph V. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Joseph V. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 9:48 am
That seems an unlikely outcome: if unfair political attacks and threats of IRS audits from the Obama administration (which seems to suffer from Koch derangement syndrome far more than the Kochs suffer from Obama derangement syndrome) haven’t deterred the Kochs, bad publicity from Ed Crane won’t. [read post]
