Search for: "Murray v. The People of The State of New" Results 1 - 20 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2024, 7:17 am by INFORRM
(see Murray v Express [2009] Ch 481, para 36) The only considerations which tell against such an expectation is the fact that the children are arriving publicly, at a border, to seek refuge. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
I remember an earlier cafeteria Catholic, Governor Mario Cuomo of New York. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am by David Pocklington
With regard to the first Duffield question, Murray Dep. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm by Marty Lederman
  As Derek Muller has explained, that practice appears to have begun in 1968, when California and New York refused to include the name of the 33-year-old Eldridge Cleaver to appear on their ballots for President (see Cleaver v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:33 pm by GSU Law Student
Quarter, a tribute that should encourage more people to recognize Pauli Murray’s name [read post]
Murray reflected on the questions asked by the justices, stating “You don’t do hard things without asking hard questions. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Kirtz, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor goes on a little longer on Murray v. [read post]
A lot of people in the United States receive their water from these really small water suppliers, some of which serve maybe just 500 people or 1,000 people. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"); Riley Gaines Assaulted by Trans Activists at San Francisco State University, Yahoo News (describing how prote [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
The United States now uses a life + 70 copyright regime, but only for works created on and after January 1, 1978. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
New Issued cases There were no new claims filed in the Media and Communication List in the last week. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The good news coming out of yesterday's oral argument in SEC v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
The justices begin the new term with a dive into the weeds of statutory interpretation in Pulsifer v. [read post]