Search for: "Mutee v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2024, 6:51 am
In the 2012 United States Supreme Court case National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Compared to earlier episodes in the long-running litigation over the Obama-era deferred action initiatives, the responses to Hanen’s latest ruling have seemed somewhat muted—not least, perhaps, because the outcome was entirely expected. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
An example is Ramos v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
And he writes, in muted terms, that “the outside experts seemed to agree with us” and “the sense of the group seemed clear: we had a case, but it was not without issues. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:49 am
Indeed, Facebook allocates 87 percent of its misinformation budget to the United States and Canada alone. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 6:33 pm
With no great revolutionary charismatic figure (or his brother) to mute dissent, it might be assumed that some reaction will eventually succeed in toppling the current government.But of course, that sort of wishful thinking has plagued many both inside and outside Cuba for a generation or more. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 3:30 am
David Allen Green, The Law and Policy Blog: The secularisation of the United Kingdom state: concluding, “Let us put disestablishment off to another year. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:30 pm
United States was a quiet one, with several of the justices saying so little that it is difficult to discern what they are thinking. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:48 pm
United States that Section 922(g) requires the government to prove that the defendant knew he was prohibited from possessing a firearm. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:04 pm
Wasserstein & JP Ellison —In a recent JAMA editorial (unfortunately behind a paywall), three authors called for increased use of the Park Responsible Corporate Officer doctrine, under which senior level officials at a company can be held liable under a strict liability theory even if they were not involved in, or even knew about, the alleged violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (United States v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am
Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:40 am
A bill to codify abortion rights was defeated Wednesday in the United States Senate. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 12:55 pm
United States cases and its more recent plurality opinion in Chavez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
License Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreements Know-How Right of First Refusal Contract Interpretation Extrinsic Evidence of a Contemporaneous Oral Agreement Parol Evidence Rule Breach of Contract Equitable Estoppel DefenseIowa LawContract Drafting Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa – Central Wildhawk Investments, LLC (“Wildhawk”) initiated this breach of contract… [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm
The Supreme court overturned the decision of the lower court, which stated that the President acted unlawfully. [read post]
