Search for: "Muzzy v. Muzzy"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
Metropolitan Water Dist. (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 382, 402 & fn. 11; Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 1:44 pm
The Supreme Court, in Tomlinson v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm
City of San Diego (”UMMP”) (2019) 7 Cal.5th 1171 (my post on which can be found here) and Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
” Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:42 pm
Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 8:51 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The questioning at oral argument was dominated by Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, who observed early on that the binding precedent of Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 10:29 am
The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) has spent five years drafting a comprehensive update to 30 sections of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) Guidelines.[1] The updated text[2] (“Final Text”) ensures the Guidelines are consistent with recent court decisions, implements legislative changes, clarifies rules governing the CEQA process, and eliminates duplicative analysis. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
(Id., quoting Duran v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:02 pm
” (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 3:09 pm
” (Quoting Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
(E.g., Saltonstall v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
In a 46-page majority opinion written by Justice Chin and joined by four other justices, punctuated by an 18-page concurring opinion (by Justice Liu, joined by Justice Werdegar) which reads like a dissent, the California Supreme Court reversed the First District Court of Appeal’s judgment in Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
…” (Quoting Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 10:09 am
” (Citing Muzzy Ranch Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:50 am
(See Muzzy Ranch v. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
Even the issue of direct tax support of churches was not universally understood to mean an "establishment" (see, e.g., Chief Justice Smith's opinion in the New Hampshire Supreme Court decision, Muzzy v. [read post]
