Search for: "My Name Ltd. v. Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 713
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 4:06 am
Double Coin Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:11 pm
A local housing authority does not provide housing accommodation “for the purpose only of exercising a public function”. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:35 am
I wrote about both of these exceptionally interesting cases previously (you can read my articles about the events preceding the recent appeals here and here). [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 5:34 pm
The power to make such orders does not derive solely from the Civil Procedure Rules. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:28 am
Direct copyright infringement charges represent a key element of the plaintiffs’ argument that the conduct of the named AI companies is unlawful. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm
Duke of Sussex v MGN Ltd [2023] EWHC 3217 (Ch). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
Strictly, the sufficiency of their interest to object to this petition does not fall for decision because, in their initial letter of objection, they state that they are ‘not raising a formal objection…’ [They] have not elected to become parties opponent; and I propose to take their observations, and representations, into account when reaching my decision irrespective of their formal standing to object to this faculty petition. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
Hot House Beauty Ltd, 2023 WL 4408919 (W.D. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
In Wrench Ltd. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Court of Appeal finds no reason to swipe right in MATCH v MUZMATCH online dating disputeMatch Group, LLC v Muzmatch Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 454 (April 2023)“MATCH” is hardly a distinctive trade mark for an online dating, aka matchmaking, service. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
Dalton v Forhousing Ltd (Manchester County Court, 19 June 2023 – copy of the judgment here ). [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 4:57 pm
The threshold of seriousness Master Bell reflected upon two notable cases, Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] 1 WLR 1985. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:57 pm
It does, however, require more than mere knowledge or consent: it requires active participation. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Depp II v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2020] EWHC 2911 (QB) Nicol J outlined that where there is an allegation of serious criminality, clear evidence is required. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Richworth Ltd v Billingham (2023) EW Misc 8 (CC) Over the years we’ve seen a number of county court decisions on the issue of when a deposit counts as returned for the purposes of being able to serve a section 21 notice (see here and the links in that report). [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
“Standing and capacity related dismissals are not on the merits” (Favourite Ltd. v Cico, 208 AD3d 99 [1st Dept 2022]), and are deemed to be “without prejudice” (B and H Florida Notes LLC v Ashkenazi, 182 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:18 pm
Secondly: in the second part of the decision in Khan, the Court of Appeal resolved the tension between Avon Ground Rents Ltd v Child (2018) UKUT 204 (LC) and John Romans Park Homes Ltd v Hancock, 17 October 2019 (His Honour Judge Martin Rodger KC), unreported. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
(See my commentary on that case here.) [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
China Southern Airlines Co., Ltd., 925 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2009)," was a real case. [read post]
