Search for: "N. Strickland" Results 1 - 20 of 133
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2024, 4:53 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
After the Huntington Beach City Council began discussing the voter ID measure last fall, Bonta and Secretary of State Shirley N. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 6:27 am by Alex Phipps
The Court then turned to the applicable review in the current case, explaining that under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am by Alex Phipps
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on March 5, 2024. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am by John Elwood
She wrote that “[i]n an appropriate future case, this Court should decide this issue. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
In Feds for Medical Freedom, the Biden administration argues that Munsingwear vacatur fundamentally turns on equity, and “[n]o principle of equity would support requiring the President to maintain the vaccination requirement, despite his determination that it is now unnecessary, merely to preserve the opportunity to ask this Court to review the Fifth Circuit’s erroneous decision. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am by Alex Phipps
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 3:25 am by SHG
Whether you’re good with lack of preservation arguments, or the exceptionally low bar of Strickland v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 11:33 am by admin
Bernstein, Edgar Erdfelder, Andrew N. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am by Jonathan Holbrook
This post summarizes published criminal decisions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on July 20, 2021. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Another excerpt from the First Amendment section of my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 12:52 pm by Phil Dixon
Ineffective assistance of counsel in the context of an unfiled motion requires a “refined” Strickland analysis: With respect to the performance prong, we ask whether the unfiled motion would have had some substance. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:20 pm by Phil Dixon
This post summarizes published criminal decisions released by the North Carolina Court of Appeals on April 20, 2021. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 12:14 pm by Christopher Tyner
Justice Newby, joined by Justice Ervin, dissented, stating the view that the jury argument in this case did not constitute the functional equivalent of an explicit admission and that a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel in a case like this requires proof of prejudice in accordance with Strickland. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 6:00 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
En un recuento de Strickland, la opinión recuerda que un acusado debe probar que el desempeño de su abogado fue deficiente y le causó perjuicio. [read post]