Search for: "N.A. v. State (In re N.A.)" Results 1 - 20 of 296
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The initial tests of the newly articulated standard for admissibility of opinion testimony in silicone litigation did not go well.[3]  Peer review, which was absent in the re-analyses relied upon in the Bendectin litigation, was superficially present in the studies relied upon in the silicone litigation. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:52 am by Eric Goldman
As such, the out-of-state Plaintiffs did not have standing to bring CCPA claims against Retail Defendants. * In re Arthur J. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The State may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge that are cloaked with judicial immunity (Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The State may not be held liable for the actions of a state-employed judge that are cloaked with judicial immunity (Montesano v State of New York, 11 AD3d 436 [2d Dept 2004]). [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:16 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Sun Bank/Miami, N.A., 922 F.2d 666, 672 (11th Cir. 1991), abrogated on other grounds by Saxton v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: NASHEL : : : : : Jose J. [read post]