Search for: "N.S. v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 22 conference) N.S. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:54 pm by Patricia Hughes
The claimants brought their claim under Quebec’s Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, but the Supreme Court stated that its analysis also applied under the Canadian Charter (Amselem, para. 37). [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
 Family Court Act § 412(2)(d) was amended to read as follows:  (d) "income cap" shall mean up to and including one hundred  eighty-four  thousand  dollars  of  the  payor's  annual  income; provided, however, beginning March  first,  two thousand twenty and every two years thereafter, the income cap amount shall increase by the sum of the average annual percentage changes  in  the  consumer … [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
In R v Belnavis the Supreme Court stated that “the reasons for this principle of deference are apparent and compelling. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2017-04-29 https://t.co/CaarCmW8l6 -> Ownership of software dispute kills development contract Tremblay-Lavigne v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:17 am by Joy Yusi
Judge Halts Trump's Immigration Order NationallyCanadian Senator Don Meredith says he won’t resign in wake of ethics probe2 Federal Judges Rule Against Trump’s Latest Travel BanCalifornia State Bar Bans Lawyers From Sex with Clients Wyoming magistrate censured, but not removed over refusal to perform same-sex marriagesDisabled N.S. worker wins discrimination claim after being denied coverage for medical marijuanaMiami prosecutors probing lawyer's hot pants in… [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]