Search for: "NATIONAL PRIDE AT WORK INC V GOVERNOR OF MICHIGAN"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2007, 8:33 am
On February 1, 2007, the Michigan Court of Appeals released its Opinion in National Pride at Work, Inc v Governor, Docket No. 265870. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 11:58 am
When Michigan voters approved a state constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in 2004, they were assured by its sponsors that it was not intended to affect domestic partnership benefits provided by some municipalities and public universities in the state, but that made no difference to a unanimous three-judge panel of the state's Court of Appeals, which ruled on February 2 in _National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 1:31 am
" In National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 3:52 pm
As the story reports, however, the more pertinent case to be cited in discussions of the so-called marriage amendment is National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 6:29 am
In an e-mail exchange, Professor Culhane invited me to consider National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 1:38 am
The law underscores the inconsistency of allowing same-sex couples some marrital benefits, but excluding them from marriage.Of course, the precedent may have limited value if state supreme courts rule as the Michigan state Supreme Court did in National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 12:06 pm
— National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 4:57 pm
National Pride at Work, Inc. v. [read post]
