Search for: "NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH" Results 1 - 20 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA insured the vitamins, and UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. contracted for them to be carried by EVA Airways Corporation, an airline headquartered in Taiwan. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
(“Towers Watson”), a Delaware company headquartered in Virginia, purchased directors and officers (“D&O”) liability insurance coverage from several insurance companies, including National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
A Meta employee replied to the operatives saying such images, rather than being treated as manipulated media and removed under certain conditions, were being reviewed by independent fact-checkers who work with the company to examine misinformation and apply warning labels to dubious content. [read post]
The court found that not only was National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (“National Union”) liable for the $3 million the employee actually stole, but that the plain language of the commercial crime policy also required coverage for the $29 million in excess costs her scheme caused Cargill to endure. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
—Cormac McCarthy, “No Country for Old Men” 1National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA., the California Supreme Court confirmed that contra proferentem and other rules of policy interpretation apply even to language insurers argue is “manuscript” as long as the provisions in question use standard-form policy terms. [read post]
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, No. 3:19cv839 (JBA), finding that there was no coverage under a directors & officers policy for defense costs associated with responding to a government subpoena. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 7:42 am by Alex M. Bein
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, the Delaware Superior Court held there was no coverage for a class action brought by the individuals who opted out of a prior class action that had been filed before the subject policies’ inception where both actions involved fundamentally identical allegations of wrongdoing. [read post]