Search for: "NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
United States Environmental Protection Agency, et al. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:46 pm by James J. Scherer
On May 25, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made its final decision on a long-running case that will redefine the power and authority that the United States Environmental Protection agency (EPA) will have to regulate and protect the navigable waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]
BP PLC et al., further separating climate litigation cases from the federal court system by holding that the nuisance claims in climate litigation shall be heard in state courts and not federal. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 8:28 am by lburchi@lawbc.com
Circuit issued its opinion in Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Electric Power Supply Association, et al – Supreme Court Docket Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Customs and Border Protection Agency, Department of Homeland Security et al., the ACCG filed a lawsuit challenging import restrictions on ancient Chinese and Cypriot coins in federal district court in Maryland. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:57 am by Steve Davies
Dale Robertson, Civil No. 89-160 and Washington Contract Loggers Assoc. et al., v. [read post]