Search for: "Napa County Board of Supervisors"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2024, 5:50 am
ALSO, PARTS OF NAPA COUNTY, AND MOVING RIGHT ACROSS THE CARQUINEZ STRAIT. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Plaintiffs sued the State Water Resources Control Board (the “Board”), alleging that the board violated the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) by granting a small domestic use registration to real parties-in-interest without first conducting an environmental review. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
In its decision certified for partial publication, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court decision that: (1) no exhaustion was required because the County failed to give adequate notice that CEQA exemptions would be considered at the public hearing by the board of supervisors; and (2) that “facilities” in Section 15301 does not include the operation of unlined landfills. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
In its decision certified for partial publication, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court decision that: (1) no exhaustion was required because the County failed to give adequate notice that CEQA exemptions would be considered at the public hearing by the board of supervisors; and (2) that “facilities” in Section 15301 does not include the operation of unlined landfills. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
County of Napa (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 444. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
County of Napa (2021) 63 Cal.App.5th 444. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am
County of Napa (1st Dist. 2021) ____ Cal.App.5th ____. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. actively represents private and public clients throughout California, with a particular emphasis over the last 12 months in Alameda, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, El Dorado, Lake, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Santa Clara, Siskiyou, Sutter, Mariposa, and Yolo counties and cities. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 9:57 pm
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 CA 4th 162; Sierra Club v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
The group is currently representing Marin County, Santa Cruz County, Sonoma County, Napa County and Tulare County in bringing affirmative claims against drug manufacturers and distributors to hold them accountable for their unlawful conduct. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
Code, § 51119) “expressly exempts from CEQA review any decision of a County board of supervisors to place parcels into timberland production zones” and that because such a decision “necessarily involves the State law’s authorization of residences and structures necessary for the management of these parcels, the findings of compatibility are governed solely by the Timberland Act. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
County of Napa (1995) 9 Cal.4th 763, 795.) [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
County of Napa (1995) 9 Cal.4th 763, 795.) [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Napa County board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162, 178), the Court stated it would review an agency’s related factual determinations for substantial evidence and pure questions of law de novo. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 11:23 am
(Citing Latinos Unidos de Napa v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
County of Kern (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 761 and California Clean Energy Committee v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:04 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162: The processing of sequential boundary line adjustments is categorically exempt from CEQA, as long as a discretionary permit is not concurrently processed. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 10:22 am
Napa County Board of Supervisors (2012) 205 Cal.App.4th 162 (holding Napa County’s revised lot line adjustment ordinance properly classified lot line adjustment decisions consistent with the Map Act’s exemption as ministerial in nature and exempt from CEQA); Friends of Juana Briones House v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 10:25 am
Napa Valley County Board of Supervisors Chairman Keith Caldwell says one possibility is housing county jail inmates at fire camps with counties paying $46.19 per day per inmate, although it would cost counties less ($8 - $10 per day) for electronic monitoring or home detention.CA Death Sentence Reversed, Conviction Upheld: Howard Mintz of Mercury News reports the CA Supreme Court unanimously reversed the death sentence in the 1987 case… [read post]