Search for: "Nathan Shapiro"
Results 1 - 20
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
Nathan Ellis Siegel and Adam Ivan Rich (Davis Wright Tremaine LLP) represent the ADL; Julie Gerchick and Patricia L. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Shapiro professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 7:00 am
It involves reports of an intimate relationship with Nathan Wade, appointed by Willis as lead prosecutor in the Trump case. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
In an article in the Yale Journal on Regulation, Nathan Atkinson, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, investigated the effectiveness of EPA enforcement by exploring violations of the Clean Air Act by stationary sources of pollution. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In scientific publishing, when scientists make a mistake, they publish an erratum or a corrigendum. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
Shapiro. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm
Sax Collegiate Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School; Travis Murdock and Nathan Osburn of ASTM International; Judge James L. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm
Sacks of Shapiro Blasi Wasserman & Hermann PA. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 9:32 am
Michael O’Hanlon, director of research and senior fellow in the Brookings Foreign Policy program, will moderate a panel discussion with Kevin McGuiness, former SkillBridge extern at the Department of Defense, and co-founders of Horizon Advisory Emily de La Bruyère and Nathan Picarsic. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
” Nathan Orians, a social worker and one of the whistleblowers, spoke at the same press conference about his experiences working at the facility. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:00 am
” Nathan Orians, a social worker and one of the whistleblowers, spoke at the same press conference about his experiences working at the facility. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:46 am
The Estate and Michael both asked lawyer Nathan Shapiro to prepare a Member Interest Purchase Agreement (MIPA). [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
The Regulatory Review is pleased to highlight our top regulatory essays of 2019 authored by a select number of our many expert contributors. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 3:01 am
Left-right political advantage isn’t a good reason to break it up, but there are plenty of nonpolitical reasons that are good [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey, George Mason Law Review] “The legal profession was regarded by both the authors of The Federalist and Alexis de Tocqueville as the anchor of the republic —- a barrier to destabilizing innovation and a constraint on excessive democratic passions. [read post]
9 May 2019, 3:02 am
Fourth Circuit ruling threatens to open “disparate-impact” floodgates Supreme Court warned of in earlier case [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato cert amicus in Waples Mobile Home Park v. de Reyes] Tags: animals, antitrust, housing discrimination, intellectual property, Seattle, Supreme Court, transgender [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:58 am
Supreme Court “should clarify that courts should consider a property’s prospective economic value when evaluating the just compensation due from regulatory takings” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato amicus in Love Field terminal gate case] The “most expensive and least effective environmental law” of all: ideas for fixing NEPA, the National Environmental Policy Act of 1970, which mandates environmental impact statements [Mark Rutzick,… [read post]
9 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
More criticism: Brad Smith on the bill’s restrictions on discussion and coordination of expenditures on speech; Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey (“If ever adopted, [HR1] would give power to one slice of Washington’s elite at the expense of American democracy’s carefully crafted checks and balances”); David A. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
The solution, Shapiro wrote, was for such courts to be seen to be robust—but not too robust. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:02 am
“The Supreme Court should…reaffirm that the Constitution’s prohibition against ex post facto lawmaking forbids states from skirting constitutional scrutiny by simply labeling penalties as ‘civil'” [Ilya Shapiro and Nathan Harvey on Cato certiorari brief in Bethea v. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
ECF No. 57 at 11; see also Shapiro v. [read post]
