Search for: "Nathanson v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2022, 2:46 am
As stated in Nathanson v Nathanson, 20 AD3d 403, 403-04 [2d Dept 2005], even if the articles of organization vest management of the company in its members generally, “such vesting of authority is ‘subject to any provisions in . . . the operating agreement . . . granting or withholding the management powers or responsibilities of one or more members”’ (quoting LLCL § 401[a]). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am
In support, Najjar relied on the decision by the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division in Nathanson v Nathanson in which the court let proceed a suit claiming that an LLC’s managing member had engaged in wrongful self-dealing by deferring payment of certain priority distributions so that interest on the unpaid distributions could accrue at a 12% interest rate. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
The Second Circuit’s Decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:27 am
This view has come under fire since Kokesh v. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
In Re Beech, Saint v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Dujmovic-Terman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Dujmovic-Terman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm
The Ontario Court of Appeal created a process R. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 9:00 am
Estate of Ethel Bolton v. [read post]
CA9: Stop suppressed as based on a hunch and represented at suppression hearing as a mere conclusion
18 May 2012, 4:50 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
" In Foley v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
Distribution v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 7:20 am
[21] In Nathanson, Schachter & Thompson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am
Smith, who teaches criminal justice at Michigan State University. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am
Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:23 pm
Ed. 2d 306 (1971), and Nathanson v. [read post]
