Search for: "Nathanson v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2022, 2:46 am by Peter J. Sluka
As stated in Nathanson v Nathanson, 20 AD3d 403, 403-04 [2d Dept 2005], even if the articles of organization vest management of the company in its members generally, “such vesting of authority is ‘subject to any provisions in . . . the operating agreement . . . granting or withholding the management powers or responsibilities of one or more members”’ (quoting LLCL § 401[a]). [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:10 am by Peter Mahler
In support, Najjar relied on the decision by the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division in Nathanson v Nathanson in which the court let proceed a suit claiming that an LLC’s managing member had engaged in wrongful self-dealing by deferring payment of certain priority distributions so that interest on the unpaid distributions could accrue at a 12% interest rate. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 4:44 pm
In Re Beech, Saint v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States Summer Zervos’ defamation claim [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 6:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Court of Appeal created a process R. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am by Transplanted Lawyer
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 11:03 am by Anna Christensen
Smith, who teaches criminal justice at Michigan State University. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]