Search for: "National Acceptance Co. of Am. v. Mars"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm
Circuit’s decision in Blassingame v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
Hallmark & Son Coal Co., 935 F. 2d 336, 342 (D.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
Mar. 24, 2004); Kathleen R. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Am. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Am. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Wainwright and Brady v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Am. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The adjuncts' presence on campus tends to be accepted as a given. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Oreskes offered the opinion that CEI has a history of opposing “progressive” policies and that it regularly advocates against “valid and widely accepted scientific research. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am
In Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm
For example, in In re Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
But I am quite happy with it. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
Because policy preferences differ across states, regulating at the state level can in the aggregate satisfy more individual preferences than a uniform national law.[3] And federalism also lets states serve as "laboratories" that can experiment with various options, and show the way for other states (and perhaps for an eventual national rule).[4] A uniform national law is sometimes appropriate to implement important national values or correct various… [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
That being the case, the kind of acceptance of religious arguments for public policies that religious critics of the liberal state demand has to be denied. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Favors v Cuomo, 2012 WL 928223 *2, 2012 US Dist LEXIS 36910, *10 [ED NY, Mar. 19, 2012, No. 11-CV-5632, Raggi, Lynch, and Irizarry, JJ.]; Rodriguez v Pataki, 2002 WL 1058054, *7, 2002 US Dist LEXIS, *25-27 [SD NY 2002, May 24, 2002, No. 02 Civ. 618, Walker, Ch. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Agencies that must assess risks and set “action levels,” or “permissible exposure limits,” or “acceptable intakes,” often work under great uncertainty, with inspired guesswork, using unproven assumptions. [read post]
