Search for: "National Bank v. Insurance Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2024, 9:16 am
Well, it doesn't protect that access from the financial services' companies own decisions; a bank or an insurance company doesn't violate the First Amendment by itself, as a matter of its own choice, refusing to do business with an advocacy group. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 8:01 am
Vullo and Governor Cuomo then issued a press release urging insurance companies and banks in New York to discontinue their relationships with the NRA. [read post]
30 May 2024, 12:35 pm
In Bantam Books v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:50 am
ShareThe Supreme Court on Thursday reinstated a lawsuit by the National Rifle Association, alleging that a New York official violated the group’s First Amendment rights when she urged banks and insurance companies not to do business with it in the wake of the 2018 shooting at a Florida high school. [read post]
22 May 2024, 1:33 pm
BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:03 pm
The full media release can be accessed here. 3 The Federal Court finds that a term in Auto & General Insurance Company’s contracts is not unfair On 22 March 2024, the Federal Court in ASIC v Auto & General Insurance Company limited [2024] FCA 272 handed down the first decision to apply the unfair contract terms (UCT) regime in the context of insurance… [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
On April 22, 2024, the Tennessee Governor signed into law House Bill 2100 (“TN HB 2100”), a fair access law that will, effective July 1, 2024, apply to, among others, national banks and state banks with more than $100 billion in assets, as well as insurers. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm
Among other things, Senate Bill 570/ House Bill 397 (both passed) authorize an electric company, a gas company, or a water company to own, manage, and recover costs associated with a thermal energy network system (i.e., connecting multiple buildings through a loop). [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
In National Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
In addition to the above-quoted definitions, the EO provides certain clarifications regarding the scope of the forthcoming regulations that may alleviate some concerns as to their breadth: The regulations will not cover transactions that are ordinarily incident to and part of the provision of financial services, including banking, capital markets, and financial insurance services, or required for compliance with any federal statutory or regulatory requirements, including any… [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 2:38 am
In this post, Adam Ferris (Senior Associate) in the Finance Disputes Team at CMS and Henry Powell (Associate) in the Real Estate Disputes Team at CMS comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Byers and Ors v Saudi National Bank [2023] UKSC 51, which was handed down on 20 December 2023. [read post]
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
Missouri, National Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 10:55 am
A case concerning whether a New York official violated the National Rifle Association’s First Amendment rights when, after the 2018 Parkland shooting, she urged banks and insurance companies to stop working with the group. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:22 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday appeared sympathetic to the National Rifle Association’s claim that a New York official violated the group’s right to freedom of speech when she urged banks and insurance companies that worked with the NRA to cut ties with the group. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 12:31 pm
National Rifle Association v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:23 am
From an amicus brief in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:17 pm
Although she could have criticized the NRA or reminded insurance companies and banks about their legal obligations without violating the First Amendment, they observe, the Supreme Court ruled in 1963 in Bantam Books v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 1:49 pm
” Even under Nieves’ high standard, the NRA is expected to win as the letters to banks and insurance companies made no reference to Carry Guard. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
The regulator has also fined a life insurance company £80,000 for conducting a predatory campaign comprising of almost 48,000 unsolicited, spam phone calls. [read post]
