Search for: "Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner, v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
UPDATE Lead Agency/Responsible Agency We Advocate Thorough Environmental Review v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Exemptions Protect Tustin Ranch v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
In Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
United States, 547 U.S. 715 (2006). [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Environmental Protection Agency (2007). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
The cases and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Protecting Our Water & Environmental Resources v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) when its employees defend the agency in Section 145 litigation. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:57 am
Backstrom On August 7, 2019, the League of United Latin American Citizens, Pesticide Action Network North America, Natural Resources Defense Council, and other petitioners (Petitioners) filed a new petition in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals seeking judicial review of United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) orders denying their request that EPA revoke all tolerances and cancel… [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
Petitioners filed suit, seeking to compel the City to set aside the Council’s CEQA decision and for damages resulting from violations of the takings, due process and equal protection clauses of the California Constitution. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:30 pm
State Air Resources Bd. (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 77. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Exemptions Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)] Administrator Pruitt leaving chlorpyrifos tolerances in effect when he did not and cannot determine that chlorpyrifos is safe under the Food Quality Protection Act. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 6:26 am
The United States, along with fellow-respondents the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Wildlife Federation, argues that the rule does fall within the provisions that trigger direct appellate review. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
On the other side, defending the propriety of the appellate forum, are the federal government and several more environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council and the National Wildlife Federation. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:32 am
Natural Resources Defense Council, 555 U.S. 7 (2008), where the Court held (in the context of a NEPA challenge) that the party seeking a preliminary injunction must show a likelihood—not just a possibility—of irreparable harm absent an injunction. [read post]
