Search for: "Nelson v. Rogers" Results 1 - 20 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
The motion cataloged Trump’s long history of verbally attacking people involved in legal proceedings against him and his allies, offering examples from this case, the D.C. federal criminal prosecution, the Georgia state prosecution, the NY civil fraud case, and the prosecution of Roger Stone. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Fraser Nelson claimed that the ruling “puts IPSO in violation of its own charter” and “has torn up” protections for opinion. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm by Samuel Eichner
Supreme Court answered an exceedingly narrow question of copyright law with potentially sweeping impact: did the purpose and character of Andy Warhol’s below ‘Orange Prince’ work—as used on a 2016 Condé Nast magazine cover—support fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of famed musician Prince Rogers Nelson a/k/a Prince? [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:15 am by Samuel Eichner
Supreme Court answered an exceedingly narrow question of copyright law with potentially sweeping impact: did the purpose and character of Andy Warhol’s below ‘Orange Prince’ work—as used on a 2016 Condé Nast magazine cover—support fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of famed musician Prince Rogers Nelson a/k/a Prince? [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:22 pm by Jake Abdo
(“Comerica”) (as representative of the Estate of Prince Rogers Nelson) in light of an assignment of Mr. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Roger Williams (R-Texas) stating a preference for Trump-era tax cut policies failed by a vote of 22-29.Climate risk disclosures. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Beshear, decided today by Judges Karen Nelson Moore, John Rogers, and Helene White (see here for the District Court order which this reverses): This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction, primarily based on the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, against enforcement of a COVID-19-related executive order by Governor Andrew G. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
FTDA cases do have slightly lower mean frequency v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Austin Sarat is Associate Provost, Associate Dean of the Faculty and William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Thomas wrote a dissent in one of the cases, Rogers v. [read post]