Search for: "Nettles v. Laws" Results 1 - 20 of 56
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2023, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
On 7 September 2023, the High Court of Northern Ireland delivered judgment in the case of McGettigan v Mannok Holdings [2023] NIKB 90. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:32 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
The whistleblower in this case was represented by Bill Nettles and Fran Trapp of the Law Offices of Bill Nettles, and Bryan Vroon of the Law Offices of Bryan A. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 4:38 am by Cyberleagle
In short, a law must have the quality of law to qualify as law. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
As part of our annual review of defamation law in the jurisdiction, we examine two notable reported judgments from 2021 and, as the Northern Ireland Assembly’s legislative programme reaches the final stages, the nature of the reforms proposed by the Defamation Bill. 2021 Cases: MacAirt and Others v JPI Media NI and Foster v Jessen Two reported judgments stood out in 2021. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Nettle v Cruse [2021] FCA 93 Sydney based plastic surgeon Dr Nettle refused to operate on Ms Cruse. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Privacy Injunctions, Emory Law Journal, Forthcoming, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2021-35, Danielle Keats Citron, University of Virginia School of Law Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after a public hearing are outstanding: Abramovich v HarperCollins and Roseneft v HarperCollins, heard 28 and 29 July 2021 (Tipples J). [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Nettle v Cruse [2021] FCA 935 – A defamation case in which judgement was entered into for the applicant. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Conclusion Over the last four decades English law has developed in conformity with the Brussels Regime. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 3:04 am by Michael Douglas
Nettle J quoted (at [269]) the following passage from the native title case Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422, 445 [49] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ): Laws and customs do not exist in a vacuum. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
  And they clearly nettled the author of the majority’s ruling, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 3:00 am by Harry Larson
” The government further cites Nettles v. [read post]