Search for: "New York Times Co. v. Superior Court (Thomas) (1997)" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Suppose that the Court in Kent for a second time drives a stake through the heart of fraud on the FDA - this time a silver one. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
New voter suppression laws work through state legislatures; and for the first time in six decades, Congressional district lines are being redrawn without federal limits set by the Voting Rights Act because of a closely divided Supreme Court decision. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Zimmmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Terry Hart
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
New York and some free speech cases late in his career were deeply persuasive and ultimate [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm by ligitsec
Litvin, New York, New York, for amicus National Basketball Association. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Patricia Hughes
” In 1997, the Supreme Court of Canada released a landmark decision involving a judge who brought her experience to bear on her decision-making: R. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 9:44 pm
(These included prolonged death by strangulation on the one hand and decapitation of the condemned prisoner on the other.) (4)In 1889, New York State became the first jurisdiction to introduce electrocution as a more scientific method of execution following concerns around the number of hangings where the prisoner took a prolonged time to die. [read post]