Search for: "Nicholas v. Howard"
Results 1 - 20
of 72
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Candidate, Stanford University), Nicholas T. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:45 am
CHASE, ET AL. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
See Schulz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 1:30 am
Citing Hodge QC, Ch in Re St Peter & St Paul Newport Pagnell [2020] ECC Oxf 8 and Eyre Ch in Re St Nicholas, Warwick (2010) 12 EccLJ 407 at paragraph 19, he noted that “the correct approach to the removal of pipe organs has been much considered by the consistory courts”, and concluded: “[20]…The presumption in favour of a further pipe organ is more likely to be rebutted by those who can show that the preference for alternative… [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:05 am
” In an essay available at SSRN, Nicholas Stephanopoulos argues thatRepublican National Committee v. [read post]
28 Mar 2020, 1:38 pm
In his 6-2 majority decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 3:27 am
Nicholas Mosvick is a Senior Fellow for Constitutional Content at the National Constitution Center. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm
United States A federal judge dismissed the $250 million defamation lawsuit filed by high school student Nicholas Sandmann against The Washington Post. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
In Gill v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am
At the Election Law Blog, Nicholas Stephanopoulos maintains that an amicus brief filed by Wisconsin in Benisek v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Krsna Avila and Nicholas Halliburton preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 4:04 am
Taneil George and Nicholas Velonis preview the case for Cornell. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:53 am
First up is Nelson v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Additional coverage comes from Howard Fischer at Tucson.com. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
” Briefly: At The Incidental Economist, Nicholas Bagley offers “a modest proposal” to “fix” the Court’s recent decision in Gobeille v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
The case of Coburn v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
He was received by the pope with marked courtesy and was appointed grand penitentiary of England, but his argument, if discussed, did not lead to any practical decision of the divorce question.In 1532 he was sent to Germany, officially as ambassador to the emperor Charles V but with instructions to establish contact with the Lutheran princes. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 6:10 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Howard Wasserman discusses the Court’s summary opinion in James v. [read post]
