Search for: "Nick Rosenkranz"
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2010, 4:28 pm
As the folks on the Senate Judiciary Committee get ready to question Elena Kagan, they'd all be well advised to review the ground-breaking new article I had the pleasure of reading this afternoon, The Subjects of the Constitution (SSRN), by my law school classmate Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
My post on a proposal by Georgetown law professor Nick Rosenkranz for a constitutional amendment barring the use of foreign law in constitutional interpretation prompted extensive comment. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 7:41 am
Check out Nick Rosenkranz's Roberts Was Wrong to Apply the Canon of Constitutional Avoidance to the Mandate. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 12:03 am
In a short essay, An American Amendment, Nick Rosenkranz proposes a constitutional amendment:... [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:04 am
My colleague Nick Rosenkranz has a very interesting article in the latest issue of the Stanford Law Review (Vol. 59, No. 5, p. 1281, 2007) on the relevance of foreign law... [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:58 am
Randy Barnett and Nick Rosenkranz to the law school community, posted at Above the Law, in response to Prof. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 11:15 pm
The panelists were Walter Dellinger, Nick Rosenkranz, Gene Schaerr, Cleta Mitchell, and myself. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 7:56 am
Rosenkranz’s visit. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 10:08 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An excellent new blog from the Federalist Society, with posts about recent and fairly recent Supreme Court decisions (so far mostly the health care cases, though also Citizens United) from Richard Epstein, John McGinnis, Rick Garnett, Nick Rosenkranz, Eileen O’Connor, Brad Smith, Kurt Lash, Rick Esenberg, and Joel Alicea — check it out. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:21 am
Written by my Georgetown colleague Nick Rosenkranz and just published in the Stanford Law Review, this article is a stunner. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:20 am
Here is the abstract:This response to Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz's critique of our earlier paper, "The Law of Other States," argues that although Rosenkranz has much of interest to say about Condorcet's influence on the founders, Condorcet's influence, or lack of influence, does not bear on the question of whether the Condorcet Jury Theorem provides a reason for courts to use foreign law and judicial decisions as relevant information for deciding cases.Here… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 1:26 pm
Nick Rosenkranz (one of a handful of conservatives on the faculty), notes on the Volokh Conspiracy:John McGinnis has an excellent post over at Library of Law and Liberty (and cross-posted at our new Heterodox Academy), highlighting the rigid liberal orthodoxy of the Association of American Law Schools (AALS). [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 7:07 pm
In an essay entitled “An American Amendment” that has already received a fair bit of attention in the blogosphere, see here and here, Nick Rosenkranz (Georgetown University Law Center) proposes a constitutional amendment that prohibits reliance on contemporary foreign law in interpreting the Constitution, see here. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:15 pm
Congratulations to my colleague Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz and the Cato Institute amicus program (i.e. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 11:36 am
Academic panelists will include — among many others — Richard Epstein, Chai Feldblum, Gail Heriot, Lucian Bebchuk, Jonathan Turley, Neal Katyal, Randy Kennedy, our own Jonathan Adler and Nick Rosenkranz, and [Eugene Volokh]. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:15 pm
Nick Rosenkranz’s post on the conference refers to Jack’s “powerful comments on what it is like to be a right-leaning professor at Harvard Law School. [read post]
9 May 2013, 8:30 pm
Meyer Debate on the Treaty Power, The Volokh Conspiracy, Jan. 13-Feb. 3, 2013, by Nick Rosenkranz, Eugene Kontorovich, Rick Pildes & Ilya Somin The Decision to Uphold the Mandate as Tax Represents a Gestalt Shift in Constitutional Law, Legal Theory Blog, June 28, 2012, by Lawrence Solum Asian-Americans, Affirmative Action, and Fisher v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz] More: Jonathan Adler on a widely noted Arthur Brooks op-ed on ideological imbalance in the academy. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 4:54 am
Part of the problem is Congressional laziness, a tendency to punt issues to the Supreme Court with poorly drawn legislation that grants large swaths of judicial discretion to interpret Congressional commands; for that, see Nick Rosenkranz. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:13 pm
Recently, my colleague, Nick Rosenkranz has argued here that, on textualist grounds, no such challenge should ever succeed. [read post]
