Search for: "Nixon v. Administrator of General Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977), the Court held that Congress could nationalize the documents, but that it was a 5th Amendment taking, requiring compensation. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
The Nixon administration amended this order with Executive Order 11478. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 9:23 am
The Nixon administration amended this order with Executive Order 11478. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 6:27 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425, 457. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:05 am
At that time, the General Services Administration performed that function. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
Administrator of General Services, 433 U. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:08 am
To the contrary, Nixon v. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 4:58 pm
Richardson moved on to become the Attorney General of the United States during Nixon’s second term and became known for resigning instead of carrying out Nixon’s order to fire Watergate Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:16 am
Administrator of General Services, 433 U.S. 425 (1977). [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
In other words, Nixon was trying to subvert the established procedures of the Justice Department. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm
We have had 10 years of total control of the air in Laos and V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
See Nixon v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am
” In particular, Justice Gorsuch notes that the majority in Nixon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” Attorney General’s Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act at 25. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
In 1970, (Republican) President Nixon signed Title X into law, which led to the creation of federally funded family-planning clinics across the country. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 10:32 am
Nixon. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Nixon --Notes and Questions --Immigration and Naturalization Services v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]
