Search for: "Nixon v. Administrator of General Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 8:40 am
I am not sure what a prosocial argument for a narcotic like fentanyl would look like, beyond its ability to deliver pain relief, but even the Nixon administration commissioned a study that found psychedelic use “can be a highly moral, productive, and personally fulfilling” pursuit. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 6:30 am
The list here is impressive and includes: People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 10:28 am
Regardless of what you think about Nixon v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:45 am
It was introduced in Nixon v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
In Buckley v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Attorney General William Baer. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:22 am
After Nixon left office, the Supreme Court, in Train v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
See Nixon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
“Nixon v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:59 am
Thirty-four years later, President Nixon signed Executive Order 11491 pursuant to his general authority over the civil service in 5 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:31 pm
These include construction workers, service workers, house cleaners, and others. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
That said, once the documentary evidence is in the trial record, it is ordinary accessible to the general public without any particularized showing of need, Nixon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
” Attorney General’s Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act at 25. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:08 am
To the contrary, Nixon v. [read post]