Search for: "No. 6409" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2020, 3:12 pm by Sean Wajert
., No. 18-CV-6409, 2020 WL 729883, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
Notice of Potential Exposure: Section 6409(d)(3) defines “notice of potential exposure” as including any of the following: notice to the employer or its representative from (a) a public health official/licensed medical provider that an employee was exposed to the qualifying individual at the worksite, or (b) from an employee/employee’s emergency contact that the employee is qualifying individual; (c) notice through the employer’s testing protocol that an employee is… [read post]
Notice of Potential Exposure: Section 6409(d)(3) defines “notice of potential exposure” as including any of the following: notice to the employer or its representative from (a) a public health official/licensed medical provider that an employee was exposed to the qualifying individual at the worksite, or (b) from an employee/employee’s emergency contact that the employee is qualifying individual; (c) notice through the employer’s testing protocol that an employee is… [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Wesley Wright and Al Catalano
Current rules provide that a modification to an eligible support structure that requires excavation or deployment outside the current site is not eligible for streamlined review under Section 6409(a). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 8:46 am by Wesley Wright and Al Catalano
The FCC clarified that the shot clock commences when: (1) the applicant takes the first procedural step required by a local jurisdiction’s 6409(a) review process and to the extent it is not done as part of the first step; and (2) submits written documentation showing that a proposed modification is an eligible facilities request under 6409(a). [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 8:39 am by Wesley Wright and Al Catalano
” In its 2014 Infrastructure Order the FCC adopted rules implementing Section 6409(a). [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:48 am by George Ticoras, Esq.
The act has been introduced as Senate Bill 3488 by Cruz and House Resolution 6409 by Meadows. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 10:48 pm by Patricia Salkin
The court ruled in favor of Plaintiffs on their fifth cause of action, holding that modification provisions of the Ordinance and DPW regulations violate section 6409 of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:53 am by Aaron Shank
 In October 2014, the FCC issued its Report and Order, and promulgated regulations interpreting Section 6409(a). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
Thus, the court noted, the purpose and effect of Section 6409(a) is to preempt states from interfering with the expansion of wireless networks pursuant to properly delegated Congressional authority. [read post]
On August 13, 2015, the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) assigned to hear evidence in BP America Inc. et. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 2:40 pm by lennyesq
This rule interprets and implements Insurance Law section 6409(d) by delineating certain expenditures that, when provided by title insurance corporations or title insurance agents to “current or prospective customers” as an inducement for title insurance business, are prohibited by the Insurance Law. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm
Additionally, Section 6409(b) of the ACA, gives the Secretary of HHS the authority to reduce the amount due and owing for violations of Section 1877. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 11:03 am by Jerri Lynn Ward, J.D.
Withdrawn Rules HHSC withdrew the proposed new §355.8203, which appeared in the August 24, 2012, issue of the Texas Register (37 TexReg 6409). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am by Lisa Murphy
It’s important to educate legislators and local governments about the 1996 Telecommunications Act, which added Section 332(c)(7) to the Communications Act of 1934. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 3:06 pm by Ilyse Schuman
The Private Sector Whistleblower Protection Streamlining Act of 2012 (H.R. 6409) introduced by Rep. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 5:46 pm by George David Wilson
No. 11-6409 ~ Aug. 29, 2011]), among others in the consolidated federal multidistrict action listed below – In Re: LIBOR-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation [11-md-2262 ~ Aug. 12, 2011] — under federal Nature of Suit Code 410-Antitrust, may hold some possible reading interest. [read post]