Search for: "Nordock Inc v. Systems Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 9:16 am by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 8:39 am by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 6:03 pm by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 6:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
Cases like Nordock illustrate that an overly expansive interpretation of the recovery available under Section 289 could lead to a resurgence in this patent-enabled chicanery, by allowing excessive damages to be extracted on the basis of the 'design' of what is, in essence, a purely functional article. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Nordock, Inc., No. 15-978 (design patent damage calculations – similar issues as Samsung v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm by Dennis Crouch
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Munchkin, Inc., No. 15-242 Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. [read post]