Search for: "Northern California Collection Service, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 304
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
— If the Northern District of California’s recent rulings with Bright Data were a bit of a surprise, its recent decision in the X Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am
Ripple Labs Inc. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm
It's because, if you file in the San Francisco Division of the Northern District of California, or in the Greenbelt Division in Maryland, you have a 100% chance of drawing a judge appointed by a President of a particular party. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
18 Feb 2024, 6:50 am
Juaregui said he now divides his time between Northern California and San Bernardino County, where he has expanded his business operations. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
” Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
First, on August 4, 2023, a plaintiff shareholder filed a securities class action lawsuit in the Northern District of Ohio against KeyCorp, the bank holding company for KeyBank, and certain of its executives. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
In this model a builder of an AI model would deal with one organization, who would collect the license revenue and then redistribute compensation proportionately (e.g., allocating a higher share to Wikipedia, the New York Times, or other sources that weight heavily in the model). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
District Judge William Orrick of the Northern District of California issued an Order[1]largely dismissing without prejudice the claims brought by artists Sarah Andersen, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz in a proposed class action lawsuit against artificial intelligence (“AI”) companies Stability AI, Inc., Stability AI Ltd. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:06 pm
Shopify, Inc., No. 22-15815, 2023 WL 8225346 (9th Cir. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:48 pm
Inc. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm
As a result, on August 13, 2020, Epic sued Apple in federal court in the Northern District of California bringing a variety of claims including federal antitrust claims under the Sherman Act, California antitrust claims, and claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Northern Regional Police Dep't of Allegheny County (W.D. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
Cecil Williams and Clark Morse at the Northern Nevada Correctional Compound in 2012. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:34 am
See Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 10:44 am
On June 5, 2023, the SEC charged Binance Holdings Limited, BAM Trading Services Inc., BAM Management US Holdings Inc., and Changpeng Zhao, founder and chief executive officer (collectively, “Binance”), for failure to register as an exchange, a broker-dealer, and a clearing agency, and failure to register the offering and sale of securities via the Binance trading platform in accordance with the Exchange Act. [read post]
15 May 2023, 11:27 am
In another Northern District of California case, plaintiffs in Doe v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
Yu on November 11, 2022 in the Superior Court for the County of San Francisco (CGC-22-603019); it was removed to the Federal Court for the Northern District of California by defendant Bytedance by Notice of Removal filed 16 February 2023 (Case No.: 3:23-cv-707). [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
In a highly anticipated opinion addressing allegations that Google failed to preserve relevant internal chat messages – despite assuring the court in a case management conference that it had – United States District Court Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California ordered Google to cover the plaintiffs’ legal costs in pursuing a Rule 37 motion and left open the possibility of the plaintiffs later pursuing nonmonetary sanctions. [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:38 am
In a highly anticipated opinion addressing allegations that Google failed to preserve relevant internal chat messages – despite assuring the court in a case management conference that it had – United States District Court Judge James Donato of the Northern District of California ordered Google to cover the plaintiffs’ legal costs in pursuing a Rule 37 motion and left open the possibility of the plaintiffs later pursuing nonmonetary sanctions. [read post]
