Search for: "Northern California Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Further, the legislative amendments to Section 25531 have “broken the once-tight link between the regulatory authority of the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) and powerplant siting decisions of the Energy Commission, such that the plenary power Article XII grants the Legislature over activities of the PUC no longer authorizes § 25531 (a). [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am by Kristian Soltes
The department brought the case in a Northern California federal court, alleging the deal would eliminate the nascent but significant competitive threat that Plaid poses to Visa in the online debit market. [read post]
Petitioners challenged the adequacy of the Draft Environmental Impact Report submitted by the Department of Water Resources in support of its request to extend its federal license from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) to operate the Oroville Dam and its related facilities. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 10:16 pm by Bona Law PC
Brief of the United States (Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission), in support of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Rasier, LLC, v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania (17-647): This case asks whether the Court should reconsider Williamson County Regional Planning Commission, v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) unanimously rejected U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 5:50 am by Justin S. Daniel
District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Franciscan Alliance v. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
  The Rule became effective on August 28, 2015; however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit stayed the Rule nationwide in October of 2015 in Murray Energy Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
District Court for the Northern District of California for approval, will also be subject to a 30-day public comment period. [read post]
In 2013, the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of California ruled that farm drainage tiles were not point sources of pollution. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
The 10 issues to watch are: Offshore wind power generation Renewable energy incentive programs Hydraulic fracturing regulation Aggregation Greenhouse gas litigation California's cap-and-trade program California's Green Chemistry program New mercury standards for coal and oil-burning power plants Fallout from CERCLA decision in Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]