Search for: "Number One Long Hing Market Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 23
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2024, 10:33 am
” Cel-Tech Commc’ns, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:00 pm
This will hinge in large part on the court’s assessment of whether the images were copied and used for a transformative purpose (akin to Google’s Book Search tool or the Turnitin plagiarism detection software), weighed against the commercial nature of these tools and their ability to negatively impact the licensing market for the underlying works. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
The Geneva freeport is often referred to as the world’s largest art collection that no one can see, housing over an estimated million artworks according to Marie Maertens including Picasso’s, Da Vinci’s, and many more.[13] Even the MOMA’s infamously massive collection of 200,000 artworks,[14] pales in comparison to Geneva Freeport’s hidden “gallery”[15]. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 12:14 pm
In Re Juul Labs, Inc., Marketing Sales Practices & Prods. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 12:18 am
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
10 May 2021, 4:02 pm
Oracle America Inc. the Court’s decision hinged on its finding that Google’s use was transformative. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The factors which led states to abandon gross receipts taxes have not changed; they remain an inefficient and inequitable form of taxation long since superseded by more modern revenue tools. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
There were also a number of reports on Sunday 22 May 2016 about another privacy “injunction”. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
Further below you can find a very long list of items in the evidentiary record of Oracle v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 7:53 pm
Punchgini, Inc. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena, with the U.S. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm
Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
“[T]he district court held that a manufacturer cannot be liable for false advertising so long as at least one qualified expert opines that the representations made are truthful, even if the overwhelming weight of scientific evidence is to the contrary. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 1:40 pm
CSC Holding Inc. case, often simply called the “Cablevision ruling”. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
The Act protects authors against both literal and non-literal copying, so long as the copied material forms a substantial part of the infringed work. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 2:21 pm
One such unsafe product tops the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 11:50 pm
The MDS case arguably made the entire fair use argument hinge on the motive of the actual copier, not the purpose of the copying. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:43 am
In 51382 Gratiot Avenue Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:28 am
KDI Distribuation [sic] Inc., 2011 WL 5116585 (C.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
