Search for: "Office of Disability Adjudication & Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2024, 5:00 am
From our office in Guelph, Peter A. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am
From our office in Guelph, Peter A. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
Applicant claimed her industrial injury caused permanent and total disability. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And he's challenging that conviction in federal court to say, well, I my conviction is invalid because it was adjudicated issued by a judge who was barred from holding office by Section 3. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And he's challenging that conviction in federal court to say, well, I my conviction is invalid because it was adjudicated issued by a judge who was barred from holding office by Section 3. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds ofeach House, remove such disability. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
Early on, a good chunk of time was also spent on Mitchell's creative argument that Section 3 cannot be enforced until an official has actually taken office, because until then Congress can also lift his disability by a 2/3 majority vote of each House. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Accordingly, it’s simply inaccurate to say, as the Daines amicus brief does (at page 14), that “the Colorado Supreme Court extended any section 3 disability beyond ‘be[ing]’ President to also merely running for President. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Accordingly, it’s simply inaccurate to say, as the Daines amicus brief does (at page 14), that “the Colorado Supreme Court extended any section 3 disability beyond ‘be[ing]’ President to also merely running for President. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
This includes state and federal courts, which have adjudicated Section Three questions in the past and continue to do so. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Specific limitations and exceptions are no better, and hard fought over years through (captured) regimes like WIPO or Copyright Office triennial review. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A hearing officer was appointed and ultimately the hearing officer issued a determination rejecting Petitioner's application for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits due to a lack substantial evidence. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A hearing officer was appointed and ultimately the hearing officer issued a determination rejecting Petitioner's application for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits due to a lack substantial evidence. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
CONGRESS REMOVED ANY ELECTORAL DISABILITY VIA THE 1872 AND 1898 AMNESTY ACTS Amicus brief of Devin Watkins and Charles Watkins I. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
On habeas review, the district court held that Smith was intellectually disabled, noting among other things that because his 72 score had a 3-point margin of error, his IQ could be as low as 69. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
The Court said that only the Commission had the authority to adjudicate medical exam disputes under the statutes. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Other WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review Bundy (Tylor) v. [read post]
