Search for: "Olmstead v. Olmstead" Results 1 - 20 of 250
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The case emerged from complaints by Nebraskans that the state was improperly subjecting mental health patients to segregation from general society, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the 1999 US Supreme Court decision Olmstead v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:42 am by Richard Hunt
Alternate conforming versions do just that, and if an alternate conforming version of a web page is the simplest or cheapest way to improve access for those with disabilities, no Title II entity should be forbidden to that technique for delivering programs and services. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ¹ Olmstead v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:07 pm by Jason Kelley
(They were wrong in 1928 in Olmstead, then right in 1967 in Katz.) [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm by James Romoser
In a 6-3 opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court ruled in Olmstead v. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 11:11 am by kgu
Justice Brandeis noted in his dissent in Olmstead v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:01 am by Ben Johnson
Less than one year after Olmstead, the Court granted certiorari in Maryland Casualty v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:54 am by Scott Bomboy
The decision overturned two prior Supreme Court decisions: Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:05 pm by Katherine Rohde
HCBS programs are especially vital in light of the Supreme Court’s Olmstead v. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 1:32 am by Rebecca C. Morgan Stetson Law
On March 3, 2022, DOJ announced "that Colorado unnecessarily segregates people with physical disabilities in nursing facilities, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
25 Dec 2021, 8:04 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Moreover, by formalizing decision-making supports for individuals living in the community, it would promote person centered care, and enable expanded efforts towards de-institutionalization, as required by the Supreme Court's decision in Olmstead v. [read post]