Search for: "Opinion of the Justices (Domicile for Voting Purposes)
"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 6:34 pm
It does make clear, however, that the privileging of markets and markets principles would breach treaty duties, and that the core notions of corporate purpose will be either rewritten or written out of domestic law. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The decision was criticized by the North Dakota’s senators, who requested an opinion by the Air Force which later claimed that the Fufeng project “presents a significant threat to national security. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Campaigns were to adhere to the draft opinion until APOC weighed in. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 1:00 pm
Please enjoy the latest edition of Short Circuit, a weekly feature from the Institute for Justice. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
We also appreciate that the Judges seek to do justice and find a fair result given their appointed role of administering the awesome power of the government to compel songwriters to accept all rates and terms of the statutory license. 1. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2020 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 2:16 pm
Prior to Justice Kerr’s death, the panel was prepared to hand down its ruling dismissing Mastercard’s appeal on a 3-2 vote. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
Definitions For purposes of the present legally binding instrument: “Victim” shall mean any persons or group of persons who individually or collectively have suffered harm, including physical or mental injury, emotional suffering, or economic loss, or substantial impairment of their human rights, through act [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
The 1885 Electoral Franchise Act was the first attempt by the Federal government to regulate voting eligibility, allowed some Indigenous people in Canada to vote, and introduced a complicated property-based requirement for voting. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 12:01 pm
As a consequence, I suggested that there were several approaches to the treaty process, each of which would serve an important, though quite distinct purpose. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 10:30 am
(In this respect, Justice Gorsuch's opinion owes an obvious debt to Will Baude [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
John Reed Stark One of the most interesting and arresting business stories of 2017 has been the astonishing proliferation of initial coin offerings (ICOs), as I discussed in a prior post (here). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
In this post, I want to focus on a small but potentially important part of the Carpenter litigation: How should an originalist Justice vote in the case? [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 5:50 am
Justice Scalia voted in favor of the tribe, though he said later in interviews that it was one of his most difficult votes. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm
The purposes of this Constitution include the following:1.1 To unite the peoples of the Band Republic into a permanent Union;1.2 To establish justice;1.3 To ensure domestic tranquility;1.4 To provide for the common defense;1.5 To promote the common welfare;1.6 To secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and to our posterity.For these purposes we the people hereby do ordain and establish this Constitution, providing that any official action inconsistent with them is… [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In my opinion, the result is a rich scholarly exchange on issues of major contemporary importance. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am
Chief Justice Leo E. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
In a unanimous opinion written by Justice Pfeifer, the court held that domicile means the place where a person resides, intends to remain, and to return when away temporarily. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:00 pm
Only four justices voted to kill it outright in all applications. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 7:28 am
A couple of days I noted: The majority opinion in the appellate court makes a pretty good case that (1) even if Emanuel’s a legal resident for voting purposes he has not physically resided in Chicago for the last year, as the statute arguably requires of candidates; and (2) the exception for service to the US applies only to voters and not candidates. [read post]
